
While I certainly don't condone the use of violence to quell protests, I also do not believe that a protest should be allowed to occur where the protesters become riotous. It is a terrible tragedy that young people lost their lives while protesting, I think everyone can agree, but the government does not allow violent protests. The first amendment says that Congress shall make no law prohibiting, "the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." Please note the word peaceably. The protests, wherever they became violent, destructive, or hateful were illegal. It is sad that the protesters were injured or killed, but they were breaking the law.
The draft card burners also broke the law. In my opinion, it is ridiculous to break the law and not expect to go to jail. For example, every time the speedometer says that I am going over the speed limit, I expect a cop to show up any minute and pull me over for breaking the established traffic laws. Possibly a better example is that of Martin Luther King Jr. He led peaceful marches and protests all over the southern United States, and was put in jail many times. He expected it. When he broke laws and went to jail, he knew that he was making a statement by going to jail peacefully. His actions spoke louder than any appeal could have. While the draft protesters wanted to make a statement by burning their cards, they still broke the law, and that deserves jail, according to the same law.
While I do not advocate our government to place undue restrictions on our civil liberties and not allow the citizens to protest, I also do not believe that justice's hand should be stayed from law breakers. The tragedies that occurred are sad, and I do not think that any of the violence on the part of the national guard or police was warranted. However, when one breaks the law, one should expect to have a punishment.